No one said that , and one of its nagging problems has always been security. Here's one glitch that you should be aware of. If you don't have write access to a file, you can't modify it. However, if you have write access to the directory, you can get around this as follows:
ls -l unwritable-r-r-r- 1 john 334 Mar 30 14:57 unwritable %
cat > unwritableunwritable: permission denied %
cat unwritable > temp%
vi temp... %
mv temp unwritableoverride protection 444 for unwritable?
cat unwritableJohn wrote this originally, and made the file read-only. But then Mike came along and wrote: I should not have been able to do this!!!
I couldn't write the file unwritable directly. But I was able to copy it, and then use vi to make whatever changes I wanted. After all, I had read access, and to copy a file, you only need to be able to read it. When I had my own copy, I could (of course) edit it to my heart's content. When I was done, I was able to mv the new file on top of unwritable. Why? Renaming a file only requires that you be able to write the file's directory. You don't need to be able to write the file itself. (Note that a cp wouldn't work - copying requires unwritable to be writable, if it already exists.) This is one reason to watch directory access fairly closely.
As you can see, allowing directory-write access to others can be dangerous. If this is a problem for you, solve it by setting yourcorrectly and using to fix permissions of existing directories. Or, you may be able to leave the directory writable and .