DSpace Repository

Multi-criteria decision making to evaluate the avian influenza control strategies in Thailand

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Vatcharaporn Esichaikul (Chairperson) en_US
dc.contributor.author Laoorom Chiempiriyakul en_US
dc.contributor.other Janecek, Paul (Member) en_US
dc.contributor.other Donyaprueth Krairit (Member) en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-12T10:43:53Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-12T10:43:53Z
dc.date.issued 2010-08 en_US
dc.identifier.other AIT RSPR no.IM-10-04 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/481
dc.description Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Information Management. en_US
dc.description.abstract In order to prevent the pandemic of Avian Influenza, making decisions on Avian Influenza control strategy is a significant and complex task because each strategy has its own different devastating impact. With the capability of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making technique (MCDM), this study is developed to support the Bureau of Disease Control and Veterinary Services, Department of Livestock Development in Thailand. The aim of this study is to develop an Avian Influenza control strategies evaluation system in order to help the decision maker to apply an appropriate strategy that meets with all of the occurred conflicts. The three interrelated major impacts including epidemiological, economics and social-ethical issues are taken into account. In this study, all of the factors and their priority weights which depend on each impact are identified. The proposed system is a web-based application by using the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). This system consists of three stakeholder groups: administrator, respondent and executive. Moreover it provides several main functions. The impact, factor and strategy are identified and managed by the administrator after that the questionnaire is generated to gather the respondents’ preferences. The result of this research is graphically represented into bar charts that executive can easily understand. According to system evaluation, the results show that the evaluators satisfy with this system because it provides their preferred functions in order to support the group decision making. In addition, the evaluators’ suggestions are mentioned to improve the system further. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship RTG Fellowship en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Asian Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Decision support systems en_US
dc.subject Avian influenza en_US
dc.subject Thailand en_US
dc.subject Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). en_US
dc.subject Multi-Criteria Decision Making technique (MCDM) en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Others en_US
dc.title Multi-criteria decision making to evaluate the avian influenza control strategies in Thailand en_US
dc.type Research Report en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright (C) 2010 by Asian Institute of Technology. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account